We Are Now Sitting Ducks

Following a meeting with top Greek diplomats, US Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland says the United States is increasing the number of Syrian refugees being accepted.

After all the terror in Europe, Brussels, Paris, rapes in Germany, no go zones in France, violence in Sweden, Mr. President you want to bring in more Islamic refugees? Is your goal the destruction of the United States? These are not just Syrian refugees, they are Islamists from all over the Middle East, many with fake passports. According to many high officials in your Administration, Mr. President, ISIS is embedded in these refugees. They, as a group, show an inordinate number of young healthy males and much fewer women and children. Since we know you are not stupid, Mr. President, the only conclusion we can draw from your policies is that you want to bring the United States down to the misery of the rest of the world. And that you have no desire to protect the citizens from harm. Terrorism to you is the new normal and it gets in the way of your radical agenda like Global Warming and income redistribution.

I think the American people are livid with distaste for your radical Marxist-Socialist agenda. This is not what America is or America wants. This is how one fast talker deceived the American people into thinking he was something he was not. We have all had enough.


Townhall reports:

http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=4819928852001&w=466&h=263<noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href=”http://video.foxnews.com”>video.foxnews.com</a></noscript&gt;

Tripling Down: After Brussels, Obama Touts Bringing Syrian Refugees to U.S.

Katie Pavlich |

Just days after the ISIS terror attack in Brussels that left 35 dead, including four Americans, and hundreds more severely wounded, President Obama is again touting plans to bring a least 10,000 Syrian refugees to the United States.

Obama’s continued tripling down on his open refugee policy is significant for a number of reasons.

1) ISIS is using the refugee crisis and refugee stream to import fighters into western Europe and the United States.

2) A number of the ISIS attackers in Paris and Brussels were not only from the same terror cell in Brussels, but were also “refugees” from Iraq and Syria.

3) Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and FBI Director James Comey admitted during congressional testimony last year that even with a two year waiting period, their departments cannot properly vet refugees coming from terror hot spots like Iraq and Syria.

“We can only query against that which we have collected and so if someone has never made a ripple in the pond in Syria in a way that would get their identity or their interests reflected in our database, we can query our database until the cows come home,” Comey during testimony last year. “Nothing will show up, because we have no record on that person.”

The two brothers who carried out the ISIS suicide bombing at the Brussels airport had a criminal record, but didn’t have a record of ties to terrorism before carrying out their attack.

Meanwhile, the State Department just sent another $20 million in aid for the ongoing refugee crisis pouring uncontrollably into Europe.

“The United States announces $20 million to support efforts by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), and the International Federation of Red Cross/Red Crescent (IFRC) to respond to increased protection, shelter, and other lifesaving assistance throughout Europe, including in Greece, Western Turkey, and the Balkans,” a release states. “This new funding brings the total U.S. humanitarian assistance for the regional response to the refugee and migrant crisis to nearly $44 million since the start of the crisis last year. Today’s announcement includes $17.5 million for UNHCR’s Regional Refugee and Migrant Response Plan for Europe, $2 million for IFRC’s revised Emergency Appeal for Greece, and $500,000 for UNFPA’s Initial Response Plan for Refugee and Migrant Women and Girls in South-Eastern Europe.”


Rush reports:

And they’ve done it here, a list of Islamic terror in the last 30 days.  Would you like the numbers?  Just to give you an idea.  This is part of the list of the Islamic terrorist attacks that TheReligionOfPeace.com website maintains.  During this time period, the past 30 days, there were 147 Islamic attacks in 25 countries in which 1,165 people were killed and 3,221 injured.

Now, how many of you thought that the only terror attack that took place in the last 30 days was Brussels?  Or maybe you heard about one in Jakarta, but no way do you think that there have been 147 of them, and no way do you think that happened in 25 different countries, and no way do you think that 1,165 people have been killed, 3,221 injured.   Our guys will find it without me sending them the link. Some of the countries…










And it goes on…



Middle Eastern countries for certain.






I want to give you the number for last year: 27,596 people were killed last year to Islamic terrorism, by Islamic terrorism, around the world.  Do you know how many people Ebola killed?  Well, it’s about 10,000 in that region, if you go to certain parts of Africa.

In 2015 there were 2,860 Islamic attacks in 53 countries; 27,596 people were killed, another 26,000 were injured in just 2015.  How many of you do those numbers surprise you?  Now, you might say, “Nah, it doesn’t surprise me stuff, I know this stuff’s all over.”  But you haven’t heard news accounts that would lead you to add that number or to get to that number by thinking of all the reports you’ve heard.  You can think of five or six major terror attacks that you heard about, 14 people killed here, 136 in Paris, but you haven’t heard anywhere near enough news to lead you to believe that almost 28,000 people were killed by militant Islamic terrorism just last year.

The Amir Taheri piece in the New York Post yesterday, that liberalism, liberalism, multiculturalism is what led to Brussels.  And even now there are people in Brussels and people in the European Union trying to blame it on right-wing zoophobia.  In other words, people in Brussels and Europe are trying to blame people like you and me, folks.  You know why?  Because we’re so racist and bigoted against militant Islamists that we are so xenophobic that we’re making them mad and we are hurting their feelings, and this is why they’re lashing out.

That’s not why Brussels happened.  Brussels happened because Europe gave up its sovereignty.  Europe stopped controlling its borders, Europe let in all manner of immigrants but never required any of them to assimilate.  Belgium is a classic illustration and example.  Belgium was a country that was established out of three different peoples, three different languages, as a buffer between Germany and France.  It never did really have a cultural identity.  Well, it did.  That’s the point.  It did have the basics of one, and it’s vanished now, as immigrants are not required in any of these European countries.  Denmark is changing on this score, by the way, to assimilate and become a member of the culture of the country that you’re emigrating to.

It’s not just that you cannot have peace if you import and immigrate a bunch of assimilate resistant ideologically driven people.  It’s not enough.  You can’t… In other words, if that’s all you do, you still have a fighting chance to save your country.  If you’re gonna openly allow people to emigrate to your country who are not going to assimilate — and we have been doing that. We have not been requiring assimilation.  That’s a stark difference between the immigration of today and the immigration prior to 1986.  Immigration prior to 1986 all the way up to the late 1800s and the 1965 act, assimilation was why they came.

They wanted to become Americans.  They wanted to be part of what was a distinct and unique American culture that contained elements of the American dream, which didn’t exist anywhere else in the world.  Yes, they might have lived together, formed basic neighborhoods — the Italian, the Irish — and they kept their identities. But they became Americans, proudly so.  They learned English, for example.  They did everything they could to let everybody know they were Americans.  And that hasn’t been happening since 1986.  The immigration since, there hasn’t been that.

We’ve been doing the opposite of assimilation.  We’ve been allowing immigrants to maintain their national language, and printing signs and everything in public in three or four or however many different languages are necessary.  We have not required, we have not forced immigrants to learn English, and without that, there is no way they can become part of the American culture. But the second half of this is the left — the Democrat Party, however you want to characterize it — their war, the war that they are conducting on the values and principles that have defined America is erasing the culture anyway.

It’s a two-prong problem, and this is fundamental to understand what happened to Brussels.  You know the 19 hijackers, many of them were headquartered in Brussels, some in Hamburg.  Brussels has long been a terrorist safe haven.  This column goes on to explain why.  But the point here is that liberalism — and by Obama’s own admission, his objective is to fundamentally transform America.  That means erase the institutions and traditions that have defined greatness in the culture. Erase it and replace it.  And we’re in the process of doing it now.

You see what’s happening in North Carolina and Georgia just recently with transgender bathrooms and the NFL and so forth, threatening these states economically that if you pass legislation that requires men to use the men’s room and women to use the women’s room, we’re not gonna bring the Super Bowl! I mean, there is an all-out war on the American culture, and it’s been going on for a long time, and it’s brought to you by the Democrat Party.  It’s brought to you by the left.  So when you combine immigration that is not required to assimilate, because you’re in the process of destroying the culture anyway, well, hello?

That’s exactly what happened to Brussels and is what is happening in the United States.

The left’s war on our principles and values is erasing the culture this country was founded withIt’s erasing the culture you and I want immigrants to assimilate into.  It’s being done purposefully.

You know, when you hear attacks on “nationalism” or “populism,” trying to make a bugaboo out of people who put their own country first: “That’s braggadocios! That’s xenophobia! That’s racism.  You’re not supposed to put your own country first.  That’s selfish.  We’re supposed to be citizens of the world, don’t you understand?  And we’re no better and no different than anybody else.”  That’s Obamaism.  So the concept of Europe and the closely related system of socialism there is to undermine cultural and economic connections to one’s own nation.

So in Europe now, you have a continent of people who’ve been taught not to believe in anything and not to be attached to their nations.  They’ve done that with open borders, wanton immigration with no assimilation. The attack on nationalism has not just been here; it’s all over Europe.  And they’ve swallowed it.  They embraced it.  They thought it was great, multiculturalism.  They thought they were saying that they were great people, that they were nondiscriminatory, that they were open to one and all. And they literally allowed their own identities to be dissolved.

And now they’re in the process of being swallowed, overrun, and being taken over.  You have a continent of people who have been taught not to believe in anything, not to be attached to their own nations. And because something always beats nothing, they’re being overrun by a bunch of seventh century zealots, militant Islamists.  And they’ve let it happen.  Belgium is a classic illustration and example of how.  This is crucial, folks. It’s happening here, whether it is a job that can be completed here as it has been in Europe, too close closest to cal. But it’s really, really frightening.  And I don’t think enough people see it for what it is and the way it is.

“On Tuesday, when Islamist suicide bombers blew themselves up in Brussels, killing 31 innocent people and injuring 240, the European Union’s foreign policy representative, the Italian Federica Mogherini, happened to be on an official visit to Amman, the Jordanian capital.  Fighting back tears, she cut short a news conference saying: ‘It’s a very sad day for Europe, as Europe and its capital are suffering the same pain that the Middle East has known and knows every single day, be it in Syria, be it elsewhere.'”

Brussels, by the way, is the capital of the European Union.  That’s why it’s the future utopia for a lot of people.  “She then mused about the role that Islam may have played in the tragedy, dismissing ‘the idea of a clash between Islam and the West.’  ‘Islam,’ she said, ‘holds a place in our Western societies. Islam belongs to Europe…I am not afraid to say that political Islam should be part of the picture.'”

Hey, why don’t you just sign the death warrant, Ms. Mogherini.  She’s classic.  She illustrates the problem.  She refuses to see it for what it is.  It’s as justified as the social Democrats, as the Tories, the Whigs, it doesn’t matter, they’re as justified as anybody else.  “Islam holds a place in our western societies.”  Islam is a religion, for crying out loud, guided by an ideology.

“Mogherini’s statement offers an insight into the mentality that has helped produce the situation in Western European societies, where fear is woven into the fabric of daily life. It is a world of illusions and false identities.  In Mogherini’s world, the sufferings of Syrians, caused by a savage regime, is on the same par as the sufferings of inhabitants of European capital cities such as Madrid, London, Paris and now Brussels that have come under attack from jihadists who kill at random. In that world, political Islam, far from being an adversary dedicated to your destruction, becomes part of the family.”

That’s exactly what they’ve done.  But Ms. Mogherini fails to see the local conclusion of her analysis, which is this.  “If Islam is no longer a religion but a political ideology, why shouldn’t it be subjected to the same treatment, including criticism, as any other political ideology, and, if it poses a present and clear danger, face outright suppression?”

In other words, they want it both ways.  One day it’s a religion, you can’t touch it, it’s a religion of peace. The next day it’s a legitimate political party, except we can’t criticize it because that would be racist or bigoted or what have you.

“What happened in Brussels was a co-production by adepts of two sick ideologies.

The first one is Islamism in its many versions, including Khomeinism in Iran, Talibanism in Afghanistan, Salafism in Arab countries, Boko Haram in Nigeria, and ISIS and its offshoots across the globe. It will remain firmly in place until it implodes under the weight of its savage contradictions, as did the old Soviet Union, or is defeated in a war as was the case with Nazi Germany and imperialist Japan.

“The other co-producer, the mushy and politically correct ‘liberal’ ideology that has seduced segments of opinion in Western democracies, can and must be combated by all those who wish to protect the democratic system in an increasingly dangerous world.

Meanwhile, liberalism, socialism, the European western social democratic model is doing the same thing the left is doing in this country, attacking the fundamental nationality and culture of each individual country, trying to erase it and replace it with whatever they dream their utopia to be.  So there’s nothing to assimilate to.  So, borders are open to one and all to come in and be who they were rather than assimilate, and it’s bye-bye country, be it Belgium, be it the United Kingdom, be it Denmark, take your pick, be it the United States.  It’s underway here, too.

So the question, why would you want to give a seat at your political table to people whose political goal is to end everything you supposedly believe in so that they can then rule by Sharia or Islamic law?  Do not misunderstand.  This is exactly what the objective is and we’re seeing it play out in Europe.  And we see the reaction to it in Brussels and elsewhere in Europe.  They cave to it and have been caving.  And all of these people caving have people just like them here in the United States.  But it’s all made possible by liberalism, folks.  This is the bottom line here and the real thrust and the point that I’m trying to make is that multiculturalism and liberalism is on the march in this country to destroy or transform what has always been this distinct American culture.

You look at hard work paying off, limited government, any number of things are being thrown upside down or disbanded and gotten away with and done away with.  And so there’s no way if these people succeed, there will not be an American culture to assimilate into.  And it’s all happening under the guise of fairness.  It’s all happening under the guise of equality and so forth.  And it makes no sense.  It makes no sense why anybody would passively sit by and let this happen.

It’s been my question about liberalism for as long as I’ve been alive, and the answers are scary.  They’re either really stupid and naive and can’t see what is right in front of their faces, or they share the belief that the United States is an immoral, unjust place and has been from the beginning and deserves this kind of overthrow, redefinition, transformation, whatever you want to call it.  I rather think it’s the latter, ’cause I don’t think they’re so naive and ignorant they can’t see this.  They see it and they’re just not bothered by it.

You look at the common enemies.  For some reason Obama and his crew do not look at Islam as a threat to their power.  Terrorism is a threat to their power, but they see that in us.  We are a threat to their power.  And we are.  We’re trying to take it away from them.  We’re trying to beat them in elections.  That’s not allowed.  That will not happen.  We pose too big a threat to them.  They could peacefully coexist with all these other people. They’re on the same place in the political prism.  They’re both out there on the left.  Both have the same common enemy:  The United States, Great Satan.

Here in America, the left thinks we’re unjust and immoral from the days of our founding.  Militant Islamists think we’re immoral and unjust because we’re infidels.  Remember I’ve told you: “You listen to the ex-president of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and you couldn’t tell the difference in what he says about America than Joe Biden on the campaign trail, or Obama.”  They talk about this country in identical ways.  They talk about Republicans in identical ways.  We are their biggest threat, making us their central enemy. The American left, Democrat Party, and liberalism worldwide, its enemy is conservatism.

Conservatism, if ever it succeeded — really succeeded — would vastly shrink the source of power, wealth, and existence for all these people, and that is government.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s