Documentary producer, Marc Morano, interviewed by Stuart Varney on ‘Climate Hustle’ film wherein Nobel Prize-winning and former UN scientists who once supported the agenda of man-made “Global Climate Change” (formerly known as “Global Warming” circa 1980s, 90s, 2000s, and prior to that name, formerly known as “The Coming Ice Age” circa the 1970s), have now become brave enough to speak the truth about how the data, figures, and ‘facts’ are manipulated, how people who disagree are shunned and have their funding cut off. Basically, Morano uncovers the scam of the New World Order with regards to Global Climate Change…or whatever the crisis du’ jour is being called.
Mr. Morano interviews Bill Nye The-Science-is-Settled-so-if-you-Disagree-with-Me-You-Must-be-Thrown-in-Prison-Guy. The film also interviews REAL scientists who have come to the realization that the man-made Global Climate Change agenda is a huge scam, that the data are manipulated, etc. These scientists are DECIDEDLY LEFT WING, former Nobel Prize winners, UN staff, and they supported people like Al Gore for president and were 100% on board with the program, until they came forward to reveal THE TRUTH.
NOTE: What people may not know is that the global central bankers, like the Rothschilds and Rockefellers, have HUGE investments in reporting the weather, controlling the data, controlling the scientists through funding and grants, etc.
Here is Rothschild talking about one-world currency and his new company, MyWeather.com:
By the way, MyWeather.com bought a controlling interest in The Weather Channel, weather.com, a few years ago (IBM has since purchased a controlling interest). Type in myweather.com into your url address bar and weather.com will come up.
AND, when you see GLOBAL CRISIS propaganda on weather.com, you should know who are the people funding this disinformation. Here is a story by Climate Central (Rockefellers) and posted on The Weather Channel, weather.com (Rothschilds):
Climate Central sounds official, right? You should believe them, right? NO! You should know who are funding these guys: The Rockefeller Brothers, et al.
When you click on the “What We Do”, then on “Funding”, on climatecentral.org, here are some names of people/families/groups with an agenda of controlling all of humanity through their central banks, like the Federal Reserve Bank, Bank of England, IMF, World Bank, European Central Bank, etc.:
Rockefeller Family Fund
Rockefeller Brothers Fund
The World Bank (Rothschilds/Rockefellers, et al) via The Nature Conservancy
Central Bankers, aka The New World Order, are behind the entire push for Carbon Taxes, Environmental Regulations, all these wars, Zika virus (owned by the Rockefeller Foundation, see here: http://www.atcc.org/products/all/VR-8…), the fake science of Global Climate Change, etc., etc. But, why? Because they suffer from what’s called Libido Dominandi: The lust or desire to dominant over another person/people.
President Obama continues to use “dangerous manmade climate change” to justify a massive regulatory onslaught that will “fundamentally transform” America’s energy, economic, business, industrial, social, legal and constitutional systems before he leaves office.
The more science batters alarmist claims, the more people realize that plant-fertilizing carbon dioxide makes life on Earth possible, the more China, India and other developing countries burn oil, gas and coal and increase their CO2 emissions to lift billions out of poverty, malnutrition, disease and brutally short lives – the more the administration issues draconian climate edicts.
Almost every department, agency and bureaucrat that didn’t eagerly volunteer has been dragooned to aid the campaign: from the EPA and Agriculture, Interior, Defense and State Departments, to the OverseasPrivate Investment Corporation. The Securities and Exchange Commission is the latest agency to re-up.
In March 2016, the Commission told ExxonMobil and Chevron they had to let shareholders vote on whether the companies must explain how their profitability might be affected by climate change and laws to prevent it. Both resolutions were rejected, but proponents vowed to return as often as it takes to win.
On April 13, 2016, the SEC published a 341-page Concept Release intended to “seek public comment” on ways to modernize, improve and enhance Regulation S-K business and financial disclosure requirements for registered companies’ annual and other reports. It asks whether new specific disclosure requirements should be added to ensure greater transparency and aid investors in determining whether companies are being socially responsible, properly handling diversity and inclusion concerns – and adequately addressing needs and risks associated with climate change, resource scarcity and sustainable development.
However, prudent investors (as well as employees, consumers and voters) might want greater disclosure, transparency and honesty regarding the full panoply of risks associated with laws and regulations imposed in the name of stabilizing Earth’s always-unstable climate and weather … mandates, preferences and subsidies enacted to support “eco-friendly” wind, solar and biofuel “alternatives” to oil, natural gas and coal … and campaign contributions that keep supportive legislators and judges in office.
This climate crisis edifice owes its existence to assertions that fossil fuel emissions have replaced natural forces in climate change, and any future changes will be disastrous. As those claims are further debunked, or enough voters and legislators become disgusted about the $1.5 trillion spent every year on climate crisis programs, the risks won’t come from climate change. They will come from a vengeful public.
No wonder Al Gore, Mike Mann and their comrades refuse to debate, jealously guard their kingdom, and chortle as state AGs prosecute “climate deniers” for racketeering. Prudent investors might want to study these issues in greater depth and raise a few questions that Obama’s SEC prefers not to entertain.
* As scientist John Christy told Congress in February, the climate agenda is driven by data that have been massaged and manipulated, assertions and predictions that are contradicted by Real World data and observations, and “demonstrably deficient” computer models that predict global temperatures way above what have actually been measured, and cannot even reproduce past temperatures. Climatology remains an immature science that cannot even explain major historical climate events, much less predict the future.
Those problems are compounded by phony “hockey stick” temperature graphs, ClimateGate emails, once reputable scientific journals rejecting papers that contest climate catastrophe claims, and headline-grabbing disaster “studies” that are based on rank speculation or written by environmental activists.
Are the alleged physical impacts of climate change real, or merely generated by computers and activists? Are they due to fossil fuels, or to natural forces that have driven climate and weather throughout history?
* Regardless of how much the United States, Europe and other developed countries slash their fossil fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions, developing nations will continue using those fuels at a feverish pace. Atmospheric CO2 concentrations will thus continue to climb beyond the 400 ppm (0.04%) level. Job losses, reduced living standards and countless other sacrifices by Americans, Europeans, Canadians and Australians – especially by poor, working class and minority families – will not affect this trend.
Will we even be able to detect the effect of developed nation sacrifices on Earth’s climate, against normal, natural fluctuations? Why aren’t we measuring the harmful effects of anti-fossil fuel laws, regulations and treaties? How are these policies and actions moral, socially responsible or sustainable?
* Many positive profit projections and other indirect benefits to business trends are based on assertions that manmade climate chaos is real and massive subsidies for renewable energy will continue. Negative effects on profits and corporate reputations are assumed to result from associations with fossil fuels.
But if governments begin to reject climate alarmism or eliminate mandates, subsidies, guaranteed loans, feed-in tariffs and exemptions from endangered species laws, companies built on this house of cards will collapse. A number of EU and Chinese wind and solar companies have already gone belly-up or lost up to 90% of their market value, as demand for their products waned. Meanwhile, companies now vilified for producing or using fossil fuels that sustain our economies, jobs and living standards would benefit.
Coal, oil and natural gas still provide over 80% of all US and global energy. Largely because of abundant natural gas produced via fracking. US CO2 emissions declined in 2014, while the EU’s rose 0.7 percent.
Shouldn’t wind turbine companies have to disclose that generating just 20% of US electricity with wind power would require some 186,000 turbines, 19,000 miles of new transmission lines, 18,000,000 acres of land, and 270,000,000 tons of concrete, steel, copper, fiberglass and rare earths? Is that sustainable?
Shouldn’t insurance companies and reinsurers have to “disclose” that their higher rates and profits are based on 20-foot higher sea levels and more violent hurricanes conjured up by bogus computer models? Doesn’t that amount to deceptive advertising, fear-mongering and corporate social irresponsibility?
* If President Obama and the SEC are going to demand full disclosure, honesty, transparency and accountability, those fundamental principles should also apply to government officials. They rarely do.
Justice Department lawyers have knowingly lied to judges in immigration cases. Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, Ben Rhodes and other officials have been caught in multiple bald-faced lies. The IRS deliberately targeted conservatives, and then destroyed records and lied about its actions. EPA bungled a mine cleanup, polluted waterways in four states and lied about the impacts. NOAA and EPA have engaged in systematic misrepresentations and data manipulation on climate change. No one has been punished.
The impacts on company profits, investors, employees, families and communities have been extensive. Government agencies want more and more power and control over our lives – but refuse to accept any accountability for incompetence, malfeasance, deliberate lies or the serious harm they cause.
This is why Americans are fed up. Perhaps the 2016 elections will finally bring long overdue change.