Democrats Are Running A Soviet-Style Campaign


Among the names of speakers were Gwen Carr, the mother of Eric Garner; Sybrina Fulton, the mother of Trayvon Martin; and Lezley McSpadden, the mother of Michael Brown, which Democrats have dubbed, “Mothers of Movement” for their activism after the death of their sons.

The group of mothers will highlight Hillary Clinton’s theme of “a lifetime of fighting for children and families,” one of four themes the convention will strive to project when it gavels in later this month.

Thin blue Line Show teels us:

Michael BrownJust when I thought it couldn’t get any worse… I read the news this morning.

Lesley McSpadden has been asked to speak at the Democratic National Convention.  She is the mother of Michael Brown, who was shot and killed by Officer Darren Wilson in Ferguson.

This is the problem with our country.  The hatred towards police has been fueled by LIES.

Hands up, don’t shoot… never happened.  Michael Brown attacked Darren Wilson and attempted to take his firearm. (Yes, that is really what happened).  He was not gunned down in cold blooded murder.

But… that narrative doesn’t get votes.  It is more popular to spew hate towards police, talk about police reform, and divide racial relations in this country than it is to speak the truth.

An entire movement built on a lie.

Now police officers are being murdered because of it.

But… she is speaking at the DNC.

I hope this makes people think.

Stay Safe.


Tom Trinko writing for American Thinker reports:

There are thousands of C-list liberal female celebrities who love all the radical policies that Hillary pushes, like removing the part of the First Amendment that covers religion, so why did the Democratic Party decide to give the podium at their convention to a self-admitted child molester?

While Lena Dunham denies that what she did was child molestation, here’s what she wrote in her autobiography – the “her” is her younger sister, who was one year old when this behavior started:

As she grew, I took to bribing her for her time and affection: one dollar in quarters if I could do her makeup like a ‘motorcycle chick.’ Three pieces of candy if I could kiss her on the lips for five seconds. Whatever she wanted to watch on TV if she would just ‘relax on me.’ Basically, anything a sexual predator might do to woo a small suburban girl I was trying… What I really wanted, beyond affection, was to feel that she needed me, that she was helpless without her big sister leading her through the world. I took a perverse pleasure in delivering bad news to her – the death of our grandfather, a fire across the street – hoping that her fear would drive her into my arms, would make her trust me.

Can you imagine if Ivanka Trump or Bristol Palin had written that?  What the media would have said?

While Dunham has apologized for offending anyone, and the media have generally said that the above quote shows nothing that should bother anyone, the reality is that neither she nor the MSM nor the Democratic Party apparently realizes it’s not okay to use sexual predator tactics on a sister.

Apparently, feminist unity doesn’t apply to one’s biological sisters.

To most sane people, it would appear that Dunham was waging her very own war on women.  Yet the Democrats have asked her to speak at their convention.

What were the Democrats thinking?

What they always think but are unwilling to generally admit to: They don’t care about morality or ethics – all that matters is power.

Dunham is successful and a big fan of Hillary, so by definition she’s okay.  Of course, the Democrats know that the media won’t even mention Dunham’s child-abusing history or her lack of true repentance for her past actions; that sort of coverage is reserved for attacking Trump’s wife’s speechwriter.  Hence, there’s minimal risk of bad optics when a self-admitted user of sexual predator tactics against her own sister endorses Hillary.

This is simply another example of the general fascist attitude of Democrat politicians, that they are above the law and any code of moral conduct.

We’ve seen this in the Democrat machines that run Chicago, Detroit, and various other American cities.  No matter how bad the corruption, the corrupt Democrats rarely see any punishment.

When it was established that Bill Clinton had lied under oath to avoid losing a sexual harassment lawsuit, Democrats in the Senate could have done the right thing and booted him from office.  After all, he wouldn’t be replaced with a Republican, but with reliably liberal Al Gore.  In fact, if they’d done so, Gore might have won in 2000.

Instead, they said that lying under oath is no big deal – at least if you’re a Democrat.

But that’s not surprising, since their response to the charges of sexual harassment against Clinton was to trash the victims – something that, when non-Democrat politicians are involved, always leads to loud moralizing from Democrats.

Similarly, the Democrats’ honoring Senator Robert Byrd, who was a founder of a KKK chapter in the 1940s, showed that power comes first and excuses any level of racism.

Make sure to tell your friends about how the Democrat Convention is honoring a self-convicted child molester.  It’ll help them understand why Democrats want Catholic nuns to pay for abortions, why Democrats want to force people to participate in gay “weddings,” and why Democrats are so keen to ensure that men can use women’s bathrooms.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s