WE OFFER THIS REPOST OF HOW OBAMA STOLE THE 2012 ELECTION THROUGH VOTER FRAUD. THE SAME SCENARIO IS ABOUT TO BE REPEATED FOR THE 2016 ELECTION
One of the aspects that pushed Obama over the top was the excellent get out the vote organization he put together. After early voting started at every Obama rally and campaign stop there were buses that transported people directly to the polls to vote as soon as the rally was over.
But beyond that there is multiple evidence of voter fraud – always on the Democrat side, never on the Republican side.
In Ohio, a critical swing state, Union members were seen busing in hundreds of Somalis who were or were not American citizens to vote the Democrat ticket.
In many states no proof of citizenship or ID was required to vote.
There are many reports of computer malfunctions where a vote for Romney came up on the screen as a vote for Obama. As the Lexington Libertarian has noted before it is relatively easy to hack computer voting machines. These machines contain no firewalls or protection against invasion. There is no program that we know of that validates proper operation by these voting machines before they are put into use.
Then there is the continuing decrease in overseas military voting even though legislation was passed in 2010 to correct any problems in this area. This seems to be a deliberate attempt to delay or discourage overseas voting to make any ballots that do get cast ineligible.
…we heard stories about electronic-machine “glitches” switching Romney votes to Obama ones. And Patrick Moran, son of Congressman Jim Moran (D-VA), was caught on tape facilitating vote fraud while Bridgeport, CT mayor Bill Finch essentially promised to commit same for a political partner in crime.
Since then, the indications of electoral criminality have been overwhelming. First there are the anecdotes, such as the court-appointed Republican poll watchers illegally expelled from 13 Philadelphia polling places in wards that, in most cases, went 99 percent for Obama; the poll observers who noted what they considered vote fraud but were powerless to stop; and the Democrats who actually bragged about voting more than once.
Then there are the statistics, such as this staggering fact: in 59 Philadelphia districts, Romney failed to get even one vote. Final Obama-Romney tally: 19,605 to 0.
Huh? Not even one person voted GOP accidentally? I mean, there even was a Washington, D.C. councilman who inadvertently voted to approve faux marriage, saying that he didn’t know what he was voting for (that would be Marion Barry).
Next, consider this report from The Columbus Dispatch:
More than one out of every five registered Ohio voters is probably ineligible to vote.
In two counties, the number of registered voters actually exceeds the voting-age population: Northwestern Ohio’s Wood County shows 109 registered voters for every 100 eligible, while in Lawrence County along the Ohio River it’s a mere 104 registered per 100 eligible.
Another 31 counties show registrations at more than 90 percent of those eligible, a rate regarded as unrealistic by most voting experts. The national average is a little more than 70 percent.
[…]Of the Buckeye State’s 7.8 million registered voters, nearly 1.6 million are regarded as “inactive.”
Understand the significance. Years ago I was contacted by a Washington, D.C. community leader (who’ll remain anonymous) who told me that he had “done some computer work for several candidates over the years in DC” and had conducted his own study of urban vote fraud. He said that inner cities’ great transiency ensures that any given large metropolis will have a great number of voters who no longer live in their precinct of registration. These areas also have Democrat operatives known by the get-out-the-vote term “block captains” or “apartment captains,” people who know the lay of the land and thus what registered voters have left town. So all they need do then is vote for these people or have others do so. This is very easy, too, with few voter-ID laws. And this is why Democrats oppose these laws so vehemently.
Now consider that Obama “won” Ohio by 100,000 votes. This means that to flip the state, Democrat surrogates had to illegally “activate” only 6.25 percent of its 1.6 million inactive voters.
Note also that Ohio secretary of state Jon Husted did ask Eric Holder’s DOJ for help negotiating conflicting federal laws pertaining to the purging ineligible voters from the rolls. The DOJ’s ultimate response? “No comment.”
Yet a voter doesn’t even have to be inactive, just disengaged. For example, when the aforementioned Patrick Moran offered advice on surrogate voting, he told an undercover reporter to masquerade as a pollster and call a targeted individual to make sure he wasn’t planning to vote. And this is nothing new. In fact, liberal leg-thriller Chris Matthews himself admitted that it has been going on for years.
Then there is the case of the missing military ballots. As Rachel Alexander at Town Hall reported:
The conservative-leaning military vote has decreased drastically since 2010 due to the so-called Military Voter Protection Act that was enacted into law the year before. It has made it so difficult for overseas military personnel to obtain absentee ballots that in Virginia and Ohio there has been a 70% decrease in requests for ballots since 2008. In Virginia, almost 30,000 fewer overseas military voters requested ballots than in 2008. In Ohio, more than 20,000 fewer overseas military voters requested ballots. This is significant considering Obama won in both states by a little over 100,000 votes.
Frankly, it is inconceivable that military interest in voting could’ve dropped so drastically given conservatives’ passion this election season. The damning conclusion? The Obama machine wants our soldiers to shed blood while it sheds their votes.
Striking as all this is, however, it’s likely just a partial picture. As with all crime, it’s a given that the discovered vote fraudsters represent only a tiny percentage of the total. And what about vote-fraud methods we haven’t even thought of yet? Remember, the Democrats have been honing this act for many, many years.
And vote fraud is Democrat domain. Liberals are the situational-values set, people who for years insisted that right and wrong is relative and that if it feels good, do it. And what feels good to them at election time is stealing votes to win – and they do it. They relish it, in fact. Like the liberal who addressed Bill Clinton’s it-depends-on-what-is-is infidelity and adamantly told me, “He did the right thing,” leftists love the con. To pull a fast one like private eye Jim Rockford, fool everyone, and get away with it is like winning the Nobel Prize in Prevarication in their world. Thus, it’s assured that there’s no small number of liberals who are currently brimming with pride at having negated the votes of countless knuckle-dragging conservatives.
Having said this, we can’t be sure about the exact magnitude of the vote fraud. But my judgment is this:
The election was likely stolen.
And whatever Barack Obama is presently, I don’t believe he will be a legitimate president come January 20.
This is why Congressman Allen West was right not to concede his Florida race. And, frankly, if Romney believes that the election may have been stolen nationally, he should withdraw his concession.
Yes, but so is vote fraud on the scale perpetrated by Obama’s minions. And people needn’t fear creating a national crisis – we are already in a national crisis. The only question is whether good Americans will stand and be counted or allow 2012 to mark our official descent into banana-republic status. (1)
After what we have seen this November, how is any American ever supposed to trust the integrity of our elections ever again? There were over 70,000 reports of voting problems on election day, and there are numerous eyewitnesses that claim that they saw voting machines change votes for one candidate to another candidate right in front of their eyes. In several of the swing states there were counties where the number of registered voters exceeded the total voting age population by a very wide margin. How in the world does that happen? Some of the vote totals that were reported in some of the most important swing states were completely and totally absurd, and yet we are just supposed to accept them on blind faith without ever being able to ask any questions. Of course the Romney campaign has already totally given up, so it isn’t as if there is any chance that the results of the presidential election could be overturned anyhow. But if massive election fraud did take place and nobody is held accountable, what kind of message will that send for the future? Will we ever be able to have faith in the integrity of our elections ever again?
The following are 22 signs that voter fraud is wildly out of control and the election was a sham…
#1 According to the Election Protection Coalition, voters across the United States reported more than 70,000 voting problems by 5 PM Eastern time on election day.
#2 There were 59 voting divisions in the city of Philadelphia where Mitt Romney did not receive a single vote. In those voting divisions, the combined vote total was 19,605 for Barack Obama and 0 for Mitt Romney.
#3 The overall voter turnout rate in Philadelphia was only about 60 percent. But in the areas of Philadelphia where Republican poll watchers were illegally removed, the voter turnout rate was over 90% and Obama received over 99% of the vote. Officials in Philadelphia have already ruled out an investigation.
#4 According to WND, one poll watcher in Pennsylvania actually claims that he witnessed voting machine software repeatedly switch votes from Mitt Romney to Barack Obama…
It was in Upper Macungie Township, near Allentown, Pa., where an auditor, Robert Ashcroft, was dispatched by Republicans to monitor the vote on Election Day. He said the software he observed would “change the selection back to default – to Obama.”
He said that happened in about 5 percent to 10 percent of the votes.
He said the changes appeared to have been made by a software program.
Ashcroft said the format for computer programming has a default status, and in this case it appeared to be designating a vote for Obama each time it went to default.
#5 Somehow Mitt Romney won 55 out of the 67 counties in the state of Pennsylvania and still managed to lose the entire state by a wide margin because of the absurd vote totals that Obama ran up in the urban areas.
#6 Barack Obama received more than 98 percent of the vote in 10 out of the 50 wards in the city of Chicago.
#7 Prior to the election, voters in the states of Nevada, North Carolina, Texas and Ohio all reported that voting machines were switching their votes for Romney over to Obama.
#8 There were more than 50 precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio where Mitt Romney received 2 votes or less.
#9 There were more than 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio where Barack Obama received more than 99 times the votesthat Mitt Romney did.
#10 Barack Obama also received more than 99% of the vote in a number of very important precincts down in Broward County, Florida.
#12 Ten counties in the swing state of Colorado have a voter registration rate of more than 100%.
#13 Barack Obama did not win in a single state that absolutely requires a photo I.D. in order to vote.
#14 In Ohio, two election judges were caught allowing unregistered voters to cast ballots.
#15 Many Ohio voters that showed up at the polls on election day were surprised when they were informed that they had already voted.
#16 In fact, there were reports all over the nation of people being unable to vote because records showed that they had already voted.
#17 According to U.S. Representative Allen West, there were numerous “voting irregularities” in St. Lucie County, Florida on election day…
“The thing that spurred our curiosity in our race was the fact that at 1 o’clock in the morning on Election Night, all of a sudden there was a 4,000-vote swing that took me from being ahead to put the lead into my opponent’s hands.”
#18 In Wisconsin, there were allegations that Obama voters were actually being bussed in from out of state…
The Democrats stationed a self described “BIG Chicago pro bono attorney” as one of their two observers at this small polling place. He remained at the polling place from 7:00 a.m. until well after 8:p.m. …..A high priced CHICAGO attorney, sitting in a Sheboygan WISCONSIN polling place, observing wards comprised of 1500 voters? …. WHY???
Why would someone from Chicago be observing in Sheboygan Wisconsin? And WHY at such a small polling place? Finally, isn’t it interesting that this would occur at the VERY polling place in which all of the above described events ALSO occurred? AGAIN WHY WOULD A CHICAGO ATTORNEY BE OBSERVING AN ELECTION POLLING PLACE WITH FEWER THAN 1500 VOTERS IN IT, IN SHEBOYGAN WISCONSIN? Of all the places where there has been suspected voting irregularities, and OUTRIGHT FRAUD throughout the ENTIRE United States, WHY HERE? WHY SHEBOYGAN? WHY THIS SMALL WARD?
This lawyer spent the day running in and out making, and taking calls, which coincidentally then coincided with influxes of groups of individuals by the van and bus loads, coming in to register, AND VOTE, using what appeared to be copied Allient energy bills. These individuals often did not have photo I.D.’s, could not remember their own addresses without looking at the paper, and became easily tripped, confused and annoyed when questioned.
Many of these same individuals, just so happened to be dressed in/wearing CHICAGO BEARS apparel, and whom openly discussed “catching busses back to Chicago” with each other, with poll workers, via their cell phones in the lobby area just outside the polling place, as well as in the parking lot, both before and AFTER registering and voting.
One woman was dressed head to toe in CHICAGO BEARS apparel including perfectly manicured BEARS fake fingernails!
She complained because registering was taking too long and she had to hurry up to catch her bus back to Chicago.
We have photos of these people in vehicles with plates from different states, photos of them leaving the polls, and other irregularities.
#19 Prior to election day, an Obama for America staffer was caught on video trying to help someone register to vote in more than one state.
#20 It is being alleged that unions in Nevada have been registering illegal immigrants and pressuring them to vote.
#21 According to townhall.com, there was a systematic effort by the Obama campaign to suppress the military vote because they knew that most military votes would go against Obama…
Aiding Obama’s win was a devious suppression of the conservative vote. The conservative-leaning military vote has decreased drastically since 2010 due to the so-called Military Voter Protection Act that was enacted into law the year before. It has made it so difficult for overseas military personnel to obtain absentee ballots that in Virginia and Ohio there has been a 70% decrease in requests for ballots since 2008. In Virginia, almost 30,000 fewer overseas military voters requested ballots than in 2008. In Ohio, more than 20,000 fewer overseas military voters requested ballots. This is significant considering Obama won in both states by a little over 100,000 votes.
#22 According to the Naval Enlisted Reserve Association, it appears that thousands of military votes from this election will never be counted at all.
So what do you think about all of this?
Do you still believe that elections in America are fair and honest? (2)
And Some More
Barack Obama received more than 99% of the vote in more than 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio on election day. In fact, there were a substantial number of precincts where Mitt Romney got exactly zero votes. So how in the world did this happen? Third world dictators don’t even get 99% of the vote. Overall, Mitt Romney received 30.12% of the vote in Cuyahoga County. There were even a bunch of precincts in Cuyahoga County that Romney actually won. But everyone certainly expected that Cuyahoga County would be Obama territory. And in most of the precincts that is exactly what we saw – large numbers of votes for both candidates but a definite edge for Obama. However, there are more than 100 precincts in Cuyahoga County where the voting results can only be described as truly bizarre. Yes, we always knew that urban areas would lean very heavily toward Obama, but are we actually expected to believe that Obama got over 99% of the votes in those areas? In more than 50 different precincts, Romney received 2 votes or less. Considering how important the swing state of Ohio was to the national election, one would think that such improbable results would get the attention of somebody out there. Could we be looking at evidence of election fraud hidden in plain sight?
Perhaps if there were just one or two precincts where Obama got more than 99% of the vote we could dismiss the results as “statistical anomalies” and ignore them.
But there were more than 100 precincts where this happened in the most important swing state in the nation.
Maybe there is some rational explanation for the numbers that you are about to see. If there is, I would really love to hear it.
What makes all of this even more alarming is that there were reports of voting machine problems during early voting in Ohio. It was being reported that some voters were claiming that they tried to vote for Romney but that the voting machines kept recording their votes as votes for Obama…
“I don’t know if it happened to anybody else or not, but this is the first time in all the years that we voted that this has ever happened to me,” said Marion, Ohio, voter Joan Stevens.
Stevens said that when she voted, it took her three tries before the machine accepted her choice to vote for Romney.
“I went to vote and I got right in the middle of Romney’s name,” Stevens told Fox News, saying that she was certain to put her finger directly on her choice for the White House.
She said that the first time she pushed “Romney,” the machine marked “Obama.”
So she pushed Romney again. Obama came up again. Then it happened a third time.
“Maybe you make a mistake once, but not three times,” she told Fox News.
The numbers that you are about to see are quite dramatic. They come straight from the website of the Cuyahoga County board of elections. Once again, I am not alleging that election fraud has actually taken place. What I am saying is that these numbers look very, very strange and that somebody needs to start asking some questions.
Posted below are voting results from the presidential election from various precincts in Cuyahoga County, Ohio. If you wish to verify these numbers, you can do so right here. In each case, the specific precinct is identified first, followed by the number of votes for Obama and then the number of votes for Romney.
In this first set of Cuyahoga County precincts, Mitt Romney received exactly zero votes in each instance…
0154 CLEVELAND -02-Q: 542 – 0
0192 CLEVELAND -04-L: 388 – 0
0204 CLEVELAND -05-E: 597 – 0
0205 CLEVELAND -05-F: 483 – 0
0206 CLEVELAND -05-G: 257 – 0
0219 CLEVELAND -05-T: 386 – 0
0228 CLEVELAND -06-H: 405 – 0
0232 CLEVELAND -06-L: 70 – 0
0233 CLEVELAND -06-M: 419 – 0
0241 CLEVELAND -06-U: 118 – 0
0248 CLEVELAND -07-F: 361 – 0
0273 CLEVELAND -08-J: 472 – 0
0280 CLEVELAND -08-Q: 49 – 0
0285 CLEVELAND -09-B: 414 – 0
0288 CLEVELAND -09-E: 478 – 0
0523 EAST CLEVELAND -04-C: 486 – 0
Are we actually supposed to believe that not a single person wanted to vote for Mitt Romney in any of those precincts?
But wait, there’s more.
In this next set of results we get to see many of the precincts where Mitt Romney received exactly one vote…
0118 CLEVELAND -01-A: 438 – 1
0144 CLEVELAND -02-G: 532 – 1
0183 CLEVELAND -04-C: 548 – 1
0185 CLEVELAND -04-E: 522 – 1
0190 CLEVELAND -04-J: 434 – 1
0200 CLEVELAND -05-A: 364 – 1
0217 CLEVELAND -05-R: 357 – 1
0240 CLEVELAND -06-T: 148 – 1
0272 CLEVELAND -08-I: 473 – 1
0274 CLEVELAND -08-K: 382 – 1
0276 CLEVELAND -08-M: 492 – 1
0279 CLEVELAND -08-P: 378 – 1
0284 CLEVELAND -09-A: 320 – 1
0287 CLEVELAND -09-D: 394 – 1
0289 CLEVELAND -09-F: 468 – 1
0290 CLEVELAND -09-G: 400 – 1
0303 CLEVELAND -10-C: 471 – 1
0312 CLEVELAND -10-L: 363 – 1
0314 CLEVELAND -10-N: 340 – 1
0315 CLEVELAND -10-O: 473 – 1
0512 EAST CLEVELAND -02-D: 437 – 1
0513 EAST CLEVELAND -02-E: 359 – 1
1040 WARRENSVILLE HTS -02-A: 523 – 1
1041 WARRENSVILLE HTS -02-B: 514 – 1
Do these numbers look believable to anyone out there?
Now let’s look at some of the Cuyahoga County precincts were Mitt Romney received exactly two votes…
0120 CLEVELAND -01-C: 531 – 2
0128 CLEVELAND -01-K: 470 – 2
0136 CLEVELAND -01-S: 635 – 2
0147 CLEVELAND -02-J: 541 – 2
0148 CLEVELAND -02-K: 632 – 2
0149 CLEVELAND -02-L: 531 – 2
0153 CLEVELAND -02-P: 564 – 2
0155 CLEVELAND -02-R: 509 – 2
0187 CLEVELAND -04-G: 491 – 2
0188 CLEVELAND -04-H: 508 – 2
0194 CLEVELAND -04-N: 520 – 2
0211 CLEVELAND -05-L: 461 – 2
0213 CLEVELAND -05-N: 324 – 2
0222 CLEVELAND -06-B: 637 – 2
0225 CLEVELAND -06-E: 505 – 2
0226 CLEVELAND -06-F: 342 – 2
0234 CLEVELAND -06-N: 244 – 2
0236 CLEVELAND -06-P: 438 – 2
0249 CLEVELAND -07-G: 446 – 2
0250 CLEVELAND -07-H: 358 – 2
0251 CLEVELAND -07-I: 445 – 2
0253 CLEVELAND -07-K: 429 – 2
0256 CLEVELAND -07-N: 433 – 2
0262 CLEVELAND -07-T: 363 – 2
0269 CLEVELAND -08-F: 463 – 2
0270 CLEVELAND -08-G: 516 – 2
0278 CLEVELAND -08-O: 405 – 2
0302 CLEVELAND -10-B: 452 – 2
0311 CLEVELAND -10-K: 476 – 2
0511 EAST CLEVELAND -02-C: 319 – 2
0515 EAST CLEVELAND -03-A: 359 – 2
0516 EAST CLEVELAND -03-B: 459 – 2
0519 EAST CLEVELAND -03-E: 293 – 2
0526 EAST CLEVELAND -04-F: 517 – 2
0625 HIGHLAND HILLS -00-A: 377 – 2
These numbers look even more bizarre when you start comparing them with the overall results from the rest of Cuyahoga County that you can find right here.
The results from most of the precincts look very much like what you would expect from a competitive national election.
But there are more than 100 precincts where the results look incredibly suspicious. Here are some more precincts where Barack Obama won more than 99% of the vote…
0119 CLEVELAND -01-B: 558 – 4
0121 CLEVELAND -01-D: 452 – 3
0122 CLEVELAND -01-E: 671 – 5
0123 CLEVELAND -01-F: 704 – 6
0124 CLEVELAND -01-G: 543 – 3
0126 CLEVELAND -01-I: 674 – 4
0127 CLEVELAND -01-J: 687 – 4
0130 CLEVELAND -01-M: 781 – 4
0132 CLEVELAND -01-O: 615 – 4
0133 CLEVELAND -01-P: 733 – 5
0134 CLEVELAND -01-Q: 753 – 6
0135 CLEVELAND -01-R: 697 – 5
0142 CLEVELAND -02-E: 434 – 3
0145 CLEVELAND -02-H: 571 – 3
0150 CLEVELAND -02-M: 503 – 4
0151 CLEVELAND -02-N: 601 – 3
0152 CLEVELAND -02-O: 621 – 3
0156 CLEVELAND -02-S: 471 – 4
0157 CLEVELAND -03-A: 489 – 3
0184 CLEVELAND -04-D: 576 – 3
0186 CLEVELAND -04-F: 572 – 3
0189 CLEVELAND -04-I: 503 – 3
0191 CLEVELAND -04-K: 508 – 4
0193 CLEVELAND -04-M: 497 – 4
0195 CLEVELAND -04-O: 599 – 3
0196 CLEVELAND -04-P: 443 – 3
0199 CLEVELAND -04-S: 686 – 5
0203 CLEVELAND -05-D: 569 – 4
0207 CLEVELAND -05-H: 341 – 3
0210 CLEVELAND -05-K: 427 – 3
0212 CLEVELAND -05-M: 340 – 3
0216 CLEVELAND -05-Q: 461 – 4
0218 CLEVELAND -05-S: 515 – 5
0221 CLEVELAND -06-A: 701 – 3
0223 CLEVELAND -06-C: 462 – 4
0227 CLEVELAND -06-G: 401 – 3
0230 CLEVELAND -06-J: 475 – 4
0254 CLEVELAND -07-L: 447 – 4
0261 CLEVELAND -07-S: 449 – 4
0271 CLEVELAND -08-H: 552 – 4
0275 CLEVELAND -08-L: 499 – 3
0282 CLEVELAND -08-S: 517 – 4
0292 CLEVELAND -09-I: 423 – 4
0294 CLEVELAND -09-K: 445 – 4
0307 CLEVELAND -10-G: 428 – 4
0317 CLEVELAND -10-Q: 446 – 3
0320 CLEVELAND -10-T: 654 – 5
0510 EAST CLEVELAND -02-B: 401 – 4
0518 EAST CLEVELAND -03-D: 374 – 3
0520 EAST CLEVELAND -03-F: 457 – 3
0521 EAST CLEVELAND -04-A: 453 – 4
1045 WARRENSVILLE HTS -04-B: 598 – 4
1049 WARRENSVILLE HTS -06-B: 480 – 4
Once again, perhaps there is a rational explanation for all of this.
But I find it really hard to believe that one candidate would get more than 99% of the vote in more than 100 precincts in one of the most important counties in the most hotly contested swing state of the 2012 election.
Unfortunately, we may never know the truth about these election results. We are just told that we can trust the voting machines and that we can trust whatever results they end up spitting out at us.
Look, I don’t know what the truth is, but where there is smoke there is usually fire. Voters reported tens of thousands of voting problems on election day, and it will be an absolute disgrace if those complaints are brushed under the rug now that the election is over.
Setting aside who won or who lost, the legitimacy of our elections if of the utmost importance. If we cannot even trust the ballot box, what do we have left?
I sincerely hope that authorities in Ohio and in the other swing states will investigate some of the voting “irregularities” that are being reported.
Millions of Americans are watching, and if all of this just gets swept under the rug there are going to be a whole lot more people that will lose faith in these voting machines.
I know that I already have.(3)
Republican Congressmen and Senators need to get together and come up with some new anti fraud legislation with teeth.
We need to permit overview and inspection of all voting machines. We need a path to instant correction of fraud being perpetrated while an election is going on. Perhaps on the spot judges to halt balloting at a voting place where irregularities are found, only to resume when everybody is satisfied the problem(s) have been corrected.
We need voter picture ID in every state and we need the ability to instantly challenge any voter that is questionable.
We need federal authorities not to have the power to stop states from purging their voting rolls from dead voters and those who have moved away. Bringing voting registration rolls up to date is a top priority in the elections from this day forward.
We need to reassert our authority over balloting and once again insure that overseas military get every opportunity to vote.
WE NEED TO PUT A STOP TO THIS IMMEDIATELY
(1)Was the 2012 Election Stolen?
By Selwyn Duke, American thinker
(2) 22 Signs That Voter Fraud Is Wildly Out Of Control And The Election Was A Sham
(3) Election Fraud? Obama Won More Than 99 Percent Of The Vote In More Than 100 Ohio Precincts, The American Dream –
- HELLO: Obama Likely Won Re-Election Through Election Fraud
- Was the 2012 Election Stolen?
- What If… The Predictions of a Romney Victory Were Right?
- Was the 2012 Election Stolen?
- Why Election Fraud will not be Investigated in 2012
- Was the 2012 Election Stolen?
- Election Fraud,42 Ways it Institutionalized Corruption and Tyranny.