Any Hacking Of The Election Was Done By Democrats

 

The Democrats led by Hillary are claiming that Trump’s election is invalid because the Russians hacked the Democrats and aided the Republicans by exposing Hillary’s scandals. But there is no claim that the Russians hacked voting machines and changed votes. There is no claim that the Russians changed any votes already cast in this election. There isn’t even any evidence that there was Russian hacking.

But there is evidence that the Democrats rigged the Primaries and denyed Bernie the victory. There is also evience that Obama and Hillary tried to rig the Israeli Presidential election.

And then there is Obama commenting on Trump’s claim during the campaign that the election was rigged. He scoffed at Trump and made fun of him. It couldn’t happen, Obama said. Now he and Hillary, since they lost, are claiming just that – that the election was rigged.

The Washington Times helps us remember how Obama and Hillary tried to influence the outcome of the Israeli Presidential election:

The State Department paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in taxpayers grants to an Israeli group that used the money to build a campaign to oust Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in last year’s Israeli parliamentary elections, a congressional investigation concluded Tuesday.

Some $350,000 was sent to OneVoice, ostensibly to support the group’s efforts to back Israeli-Palestinian peace settlement negotiations. But OneVoice used the money to build a voter database, train activists and hire a political consulting firm with ties to President Obama’s campaign — all of which set the stage for an anti-Netanyahu campaign, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations said in a bipartisan staff report.

And Breitbart reported at the time:

Just days after the Obama White House accused House Speaker John Boehner of “breaking protocol” by inviting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to address a joint session of Congress, a team of up to five Obama campaign operatives has reportedly arrived in Israel to lead a campaign to defeat the Israeli Prime Minister in upcoming national elections scheduled for March 17.

The anti-Netanyahu, left wing Israeli newspaper Haaretz reports a group called “One Voice,” reportedly funded by American donors, is paying for the Obama campaign team. That group is reportedly being led by Obama’s 2012 field director Jeremy Bird.

As Jerusalem Post columnist and putative Knesset candidate Caroline Glick reported on her Facebook page, “Obama won’t meet Benjamin Netanyahu in Washington when he addresses the Joint Houses of Congress in March because of Netanyahu’s visit’s proximity to the Israeli elections. And Obama, of course believes in protocol and propriety which is why he won’t get involved.” And yet, Glick adds, “He’s just sending his 2012 field campaign manager to Israel to run a campaign to defeat Netanyahu.”

For all the harsh accusations of foreign interference currently being leveled against GOP Speaker John Boehner, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer, reports of Obama operatives actively working to unseat a democratically elected leader of a strong U.S. ally is hardly the news it might appear to be.

The Obama White House has aggressively worked to defeat allied leaders it has not liked and to elect or re-elect foreign leaders it does like. As the Times of Israel recently reported, the list of Obama Administration meddling in foreign elections is a long one.

Now as to Russian Hacking Rush has these comments:

rush-22So be clear, ladies and gentlemen, I’m not denying the Russians try to hack our computer systems, nor the ChiComs.  Both do, and others.  The Israelis try to hack.  It is part of intelligence gathering. We’re prepared for it; we look for it. But the way Podesta’s emails were exposed is not how the Russians hack.  It wasn’t really a hack.  It was a phishing. It was a cheap phishing attack. It was an email that Podesta clicked on urging him to change his password at this site because it had been corrupted and he got a note from an IT guy in the campaign that it was legitimate.

Now this IT guy says, “No, that’s a typo. My autocorrect screwed up. I meant to tell Podesta it was illegitimate.” So because of a phishing attack we now know what was contained in Podesta’s emails.  It’s not a Russian hack.  The Russians are hacking everybody all the time! The Russians hacked Hillary’s server, or tried to.  But that’s not why the Democrats lost the election.  They lost the election because wherever Trump and Hillary campaigned face-to-face, she lost.

That’s the bottom line. You can talk about the popular vote all you want, but the great blue wall? She didn’t even go there.  She thought she had it in the bag.  Trump outworked her. Trump outsmarted her.  Trump, everything about his campaign was innovative and revolutionary, compared to her. She was a bad candidate. She had no plan. It was just — and the Democrats can’t accept that they’re rejected. They just can’t accept it.  It had to be cheating; it had to be hackery or had to be something.

On this Electoral College push, once again Lawrence Lessig, the Harvard Law professor is claiming now that 20 electors will abandon Donald Trump. And it’s a Van Jones PR firm that is trying to convince electors to abandon Trump and not vote for him and to vote for Hillary.  They are urging electors to break the law.  And it is a coordinated White House and Clinton campaign effort.

This is after Mrs. Clinton said she would accept the outcome of the election, that it would be childish and damaging to our democracy not to.  She was talking about Trump at the time in the last presidential debate.  And now these electors supposedly are asking for intel briefings.  These electors want to have some intel on what’s going on with the Russian hack because all they’re doing is reading the news, and they’re seeing that the Russians hacked the election, which the Russians didn’t do.

But if they want intelligence briefings, how about the intel on how the Clinton campaign working with Debbie “Blabbermouth” Schultz at the DNC literally rigged the primary against Bernie Sanders?  Do you know that this has been unequivocally established and proven?  It is a fact that if there was any rigging going on in this election, it was the Democrat Party and the Clinton campaign, the DNC and the Clinton campaign rigging the game against Crazy Bernie.

My instincts told me this was going on from the get-go.  I think I’m one of the first on the record to tell you that Bernie Sanders was never gonna be the nominee of this party. No matter what happened, it wasn’t gonna happen, that Crazy Bernie was out there to give Hillary a fight to make it look like she could overcome opposition, make it look like she could overcome adversity, ’cause they were all worried.

I mean, everybody set up a coronation.  Hillary Clinton was going to be given the Democrat Party nomination, but they had to rig it and make it look like — now, Crazy Bernie wasn’t in on it.  I mean, he really wanted to win.  He became a useful idiot and foil.  So he goes out there and he’s under the impression he can really win and his crowds are huge and the enthusiasm is big. Meanwhile, Hillary still can’t draw flies, and Hillary’s never worried. And after every primary when Crazy Bernie wins and beats her in the popular vote, guess what happens?  She got all the delegates.

Does anything sound familiar here?  Look at the superdelegates in the Democrat convention in the same way we look at the Electoral College.  Hillary is out there losing the popular vote in primary after primary after primary.  And yet couple, three days after each primary, the delegate count is examined, and, lo and behold, Hillary’s delegate count continues to climb even though she’s losing state after state after state to Crazy Bernie.  It was rigged.  Crazy Bernie didn’t know it.  When he found out, he sold out and threw in with the party for the sake of party unity and everything.

But they humiliated him.  And these people now run around talking about how this election was rigged and how it was hacked by the Russians?  Well, we know how Hillary Clinton rigged and the DNC rigged the game against Crazy Bernie.  You electors thinking of voting for Hillary and you want intel briefings?  Maybe you ought to ask somebody to come in and tell you exactly how Hillary Clinton cheated and stole the Democrat nomination from Bernie Sanders.  That’s what you need to look at.

Cyber attacks are common nation to nation.  Cyber security is a big deal.  We have been told countless times of the efforts to hack the Pentagon, to hack the State Department.  Nobody’s denying.  The way the Democrats are setting this up is that if you deny their allegation, they want it known that you’re denying the Russians hacked.  Nobody’s saying that.  What they’re saying, what they’re asserting is simply not true.  The Russians did not hack the election.

They want the low-information crowd to believe that the Russians tampered with the vote somehow.  That’s what they want people to believe.  And nobody, not even the New York Times is alleging that.  But that’s what they want you to think.  Just to say it again.  Elections where votes are concerned, there are two aspects.  There’s the balloting and the counting.  People cast their votes, and then people count them.  The exit polls don’t count.  They’re not official.  They don’t matter a hill of beans, except the Democrats are now trying to say that the exit polls show that Hillary won.  Look, that’s why everybody thought even at nine p.m. on election night Hillary’s gonna win.

So the Democrats have tried this trick before.  The exit polls were right, and the actual count was wrong.  It means the exit polls, people coming out were telling the pollsters the truth, but whoever counted the votes cheated.  Well, guess what we found?  In the recounts of the three states where the Hillary campaign made it look like they had nothing to do with it, Jill Stein did, but it was the Hillary campaign really buying and paying for this — Trump expanded his count in two of the three states.

In Detroit, do you know what has been found?  More votes were counted than were cast.  Now, who runs Detroit?  Not the Russians, and not the Republicans.  The Democrats run Detroit.  So they have found some cheating.  They have found some, shall we say, irregularities.  More votes counted than were cast.  They’re chalking it up to a machine error or a series of machine errors, but it happened in Detroit, and the Democrats own and control and run everything in Detroit.

I mean, the Republicans don’t even live to tell the tale if they go vote there.  It just doesn’t happen.  That’s a bit of an exaggeration to make the point.  When there was cheating the Democrats’ fingerprints are on it, is the bottom line, not the Russians’.  Again, the Democrats are trying to make you think the Russians tampered with the outcome.  The recount that Jill Stein wanted in three states shows that Trump expanded his vote total, and the recount showed that the actual count was so close to what the recount was that there couldn’t have been any serious cheating.

So here come the media, the New York Times and the Democrat Party whining and moaning, complaining about the Russians, trying to make you think the Russians hacked the election. What the Russians supposedly hacked was Podesta’s emails.  We don’t know if the Russians hacked Podesta’s emails.  We do know the Russians attempt to hack everything.

There is no evidence linking any of the hacks to the Russian government.  The FBI and the CIA are at variance with each other on details of this.  The White House Office of National intelligence does not believe what the CIA is saying.  There is no consensus.

There is no unilateral agreement as to what happened here. So the media is off and running, writing a daily script of the soap opera creating their own narrative.  And that narrative is that Trump loves Putin, and that’s bad.  Putin is a bad guy.  Putin is a mean guy.  Trump is a bad guy.  Trump is a mean guy.  Trump loves Putin.  Putin loves Trump.  Putin was benefiting Trump by airing all the dirty Democrat laundry, and this is not fair.

That’s the crux of the story.  And in this sense, they don’t tell us why Putin wanted Trump to win, when most people with common sense would think that Putin would like a lackey in office, like Hillary Clinton, who has been on record demonstrating her naivete and dare I say stupidity.  The plastic red reset button with the Russians.  Never mind that the Democrat Party has, up ’til now, been in bed with Russia.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s