Obama Outsourced Trump Surveillance To British Intelligence

The reason there is no paper trail to follow the surveillance of Trump is that no US Agencies were involved, NO FISA Court, in his surveillance. The Britsh were. And the spying the Britsh did was paid for by Obama who received it and then distributed it across all the US Intelligence Agencies after he had changed the rules that now permitted that widespread a distribution.

So what happened after Trump’s claim that he had been “wiretapped” by Obama is that an investigation into FISA court records shows that no FISA warrant to tap Trump was issued although one was applied for in October and was denied. Everybody then said that Trump was blowing hot air. Some even said he was lying in order to muddy the waters. But after being rejected by the FISA court in October Obama went to British Intelligence and they did the surveillance for him. Obama then passed around the British surveillance everywhere so that more surveillance would be done by entities other than the US.

The only problem is that the British made up some of their stuff. These lies never happened although they were believed by many.

Judge Andrew Napolitano, the senior judicial analyst for Fox News, arrives at Trump Tower in New York on December 15, 2016. / AFP / JIM WATSON (Photo credit should read JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images)

Zero Hedge reports:

Roughly a month ago, during the height of the mainstream media mania over Trump’s alleged collusion with Russia, Judge Andrew Napolitano appeared on Fox and Friends with a startling new revelation, namely that President Obama circumvented U.S. law and employed a British intelligence agency to conduct surveillance of the Trump campaign.  Despite Napolitano’s assertion that the information had been confirmed by 3 separate sources, the Obama administration and foreign intelligence agencies issued immediate denials and the mainstream media was all too happy to trash the latest ‘conspiracy theory’ of their competitor network.  Here’s what he said:

“Three intelligence sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of command.  He didn’t use the NSA, he didn’t use the CIA, he didn’t use the FBI, and he didn’t use the Department of Justice.  He used GCHQ.”

“What the heck is GCHQ? That’s the initials for the British spying agency. They have 24/7 access to the NSA database.”

“So by simply having two people go to them saying, ‘President Obama needs transcripts of conversations involving candidate Trump, conversations involving president-elect Trump,’ he’s able to get it, and there’s no American fingerprints on this.”

Of course,  Napolitano’s efforts ultimately earned him a multi-day suspension from Fox News.

Now, some 30 days after Napolitano broke the story, CNN seems to have just confirmed it

Rush reports:

Judge Napolitano Was Right! The World Was Spying on Donald Trump

And it turns out, folks, I think it turns out here that good old Judge Napolitano was right. Remember when he said that it was a British spy agency that had been digging into Trump and collusion in Russia, and he goes on Fox and announces it, and everybody says, “You’re a nut, Judge. You just made it up. It isn’t true.” Fox suspends him for a while, he comes back. After his suspension he comes back and he keeps repeating it. And I’m saying, “What? Judge, what are you doing here? They just suspended you for this. And now you’re back.” And it turns out it looks like he was right.

“British Spies Were the First to Spot Trump Team’s Leaks with Russia.” And the very group that the judge cited is called GCHQ. That’s the British spy agency said to have alerted U.S. agencies after becoming aware of contacts in 2015. That’s in the U.K. Guardian. What has now been established, the world was spying on Donald Trump. Obama had seen to it after the Brits clued him in I guess is the timeline this story wants to advance. The world was spying on Trump. And even with all of that Hillary couldn’t win. Even with the establishment of the world aligned against Donald Trump and in support of Hillary Clinton, she couldn’t win.

But the way it ends up here, we know that Obama released intel data gathered by domestic agencies to 16 other intel agencies, including many foreign countries around the world, making sure that whatever was dug up and learned about Trump — and that is another thing. They found nothing. The world was investigating Donald Trump and his collusion with Russia for over a year-and-a-half, and they found nothing.

Believe me, if they would have found it, we would have heard about it in late October when they started to get worried that the NBC tape didn’t take Trump out of the race. If they had found anything, we would have heard it by now. They got zilch, folks, zilch, zero, nada, and yet they won’t give it up.

What this means is just about every Western civilization intelligence service was working with Obama. And all of this was to elect Hillary. This is the key, I think, to understanding this. And despite, despite all of this, despite the U.K., the world, Obama, all of these people spying on Trump and desperately trying to find a disqualifying connection, despite all of this, despite the Access Hollywood NBC tape, despite Trump saying what he said, he still won, still beat Hillary Clinton. They still failed to defeat Donald Trump.

And the U.K. Guardian, of course, does not treat it as I just did. What they try to do is what the intel agencies and the deep state have been doing ever since this story began. They have been trying to make it look like there is something there when there isn’t. Folks, for a year and a half the world was spying on Donald Trump, the western world.

Now, we know, we know that they had nothing on Trump because if they had it we’d know about it long before today. If they had something on Trump, they would have revealed it during the campaign. The truth is, even despite this massive intel and spying effort, they found nothing.

You know what I think the hacking of the DNC computer network was? I think that was to get information to use against her as president. I don’t think they were hacking the DNC to undermine her campaign ’cause I don’t think they even considered for a moment that she would lose. I think they hacked her computer network, the DNC computer — they failed at that with the GOP, but they succeeded — can you imagine what they would have been able to hold over Hillary Clinton with the news that Hillary had cheated against Crazy Bernie?

Can you imagine what the Russians would have been able to do vis-a-vis Hillary with whatever it was they learned in Podesta’s emails? That stuff ends up leaking out anyway. But I think it was collected for use after she became president. So you might say, “Well, then why are they continuing to push this story?” Folks, ’cause they’ve got nothing else. They don’t have anything else to explain why she lost, except that, and that’s important for their voters in 2018 and 2020 to believe that she actually won and had it stolen from her.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s