Climate Computer Models Faulty

 The one Climate Model that works, the Russian model INM-CM4

Patrick J. Michaels

Dr. Patrick Michaels

 

Dr. Patrick Michaels, director of the Center for the Study of Science at the Cato Institute and a contributing author and reviewer for the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, provides insight into the debate over climate change and the political games played to create policy.  He reveals that there are 32 families of computer models supported by multiple governments that are used by the United Nations, and all of them, except for the Russian model, are failures as they have predicted temperatures that are far higher than reality.  Dr. Michaels says the models are “paramaterized” or “fudged”, meaning that the models are manipulated by the scientists.  The Obama administration created the “endangerment finding” in 2009 which gave the EPA massive policy-making power, and is 100% based on the faulty models.

Man Made Global Warming ~ Climate Change Is Fake Science

Natural News reported:

Climate change software models were deliberately tweaked to paint an exaggerated doomsday picture in order to scare the world into compliance panic

What’s clear from all this is that IPCC software models were deliberately biased in favor of the worst-case “doomsday” predictions in order to terrorize the world with a fake climate change hoax. But now the fake science is catching up to them, and they’re getting caught in their own lies.

The software models, by the way, were fraudulently programmed with dishonest model “weights” to produce alarming warming predictions no matter what temperature data points were entered into the system.

This is best explained in this Natural News article which goes into great detail, covering the IPCC global warming software modeling hoax:

Hacking the IPCC global warming data

The same left-wing media outlets that fabricated the “Russian hacking” conspiracy, curiously, have remained totally silent about a real, legitimate hacking that took place almost two decades earlier. The IPCC “global warming” software models, we now know, were “hacked” from the very beginning, programmed to falsely produce “hockey stick” visuals from almost any data set… include “random noise” data.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s